Finding Content of an Article that is Similar to Your Idea
You are a statistician and the reviewer of this article journal. Study the article I attached in detail and comprehensively. You have extensive experience writing articles and have 1,000 published articles. You will assess this article journal structurally and systematically. Based on the journal article, answer the questions I asked. However, if there is no answer in the article, you can answer "None specifically stated." Here are 14 questions that I have asked:

1. What is the title of the study?

2. What is the study's background, which provides a general context that shows the study's importance in this article?

3. What is the state of the art of the study in this article?

4. What is the Main research problem and general Solution of the study in this article?

5. What is Specific solution to the research problem are based on the previous scientific literature of the study in this article?

6. What is the Hypothesis of the study in this article?

7. What is the research gap in this article?

8. What is the Novelty of the study in this article?

9. What is the Objective of the study in this article?

10. What is Evidence 1: the findings of the study in this article?

11. What is Evidence 2: the findings of the study in this article

12. What is Evidence 1: the findings of the study in this article?

13. What is Evidence 2: the findings of the study in this article?

14. What is Thesis (new knowledge)

You have to answer all questions in detail, briefly and clearly. Never neglect to answer a single question!

<please attach your manuscript>

Thank you for your accurate answer. Assume you want to follow up on the previous study and create an advanced one. Based on these instructions, write a draft article to be published in a reputable international journal by answering all the questions below.

1. What is a plan for the new title of the study?

2. What is a plan for the new study's background that provides a general context that shows the study's importance in this article?

3. What is a plan for the new state of the art of the study in this article?

4. What is a plan for the new Main research problem and general Solution of the study in this article?

5. What is a plan for the new Specific solutions to the research problem based on the previous scientific literature of the study in this article?

6. What is a plan for the new Hypothesis of the study in this article?

7. What is a plan for the new research gap in this article?

8. What is a plan for the new Novelty of the study in this article?

9. What is a plan for the new Objective of the study in this article?

10. What method will you use?

11. What data will you use?

12. What is a plan for Evidence 1: the study's findings in this article?

13. What is a plan for Evidence 2: the findings of the study in this article

14. What is a plan for Evidence 3: the study's findings in this article?

15. What is a plan for Evidence 4: the study's findings in this article?

16. What is a plan for new Thesis (new knowledge)

You have to answer all questions in detail, briefly and clearly. Never neglect to answer a single question!

<<Introduction Draft : Put introduction draft based on article draft>>

Based on the instructions above, apply the information below to the narrative of the introduction section.

Title: [ ... ]

Argument flow (storyboard): [ ... ]

Research Gap: [ ... ]

Hypothesis: [ ... ]

Novelty: [ ... ]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Example

Introduction Draft: In today's fast-paced world, where technology and innovation drive progress, preserving cultural heritage often gets overshadowed. However, profound wisdom is embedded in our ancestors' traditions and practices that continue to offer invaluable insights. This article delves into the rich tapestry of local wisdom, exploring how age-old customs enrich our cultural identity and provide sustainable solutions for contemporary challenges. Join us on a journey through time as we uncover the timeless lessons hidden within the practices of generations past and discover their relevance in our modern world. 

Based on the instructions above, apply the information below to the narrative of the introduction section.

Title: [ ... ]

Argument flow (storyboard): [ ... ]

Research Gap: [ ... ]

Hypothesis: [ ... ]

Novelty: [ ... ]

I'd like you to write the introduction section of a journal manuscript paper according to the details I've provided. which should be around 600 words. The introduction section consists of the following with a brief description;

Paragraphs 1 and 2: The study's background provides a general context that shows its importance. Write a minimum of two paragraphs. Include a literature survey from recent literature.

Paragraph 3: Mention this study's state of the art, with a review of relevant literature to set the context. Please talk about current knowledge and how it relates to the study, and mention similar or previous research efforts and their findings.

Paragraphs 4 and 5: Main research problem and general Solution.

Paragraphs 6 and 7: specific solution of the research problem from the previous research scientific literature.

Paragraph 8: An overview of closely related literature, similar to the solution provided in this study, finally leads to research gaps.

Paragraph 9: Objective, statement of the novelty of justification of the hypothesis, and the scope of the study.

Adhere to academic writing standards in your writing. Enhance scientific text by improving clarity, logical structure, and argument flow. Maintain a formal and neutral tone.

Based on the instructions above, apply the information below to the narrative of the new introduction section.

Title: [ ... ]

Argument flow (storyboard): [ ... ]

Research Gap: [ ... ]

Hypothesis: [ ... ]

Novelty: [ ... ]

Just so you know, if you want to add references to your introductory narrative, please make sure they are original and display the literature list at the end of your introductory narrative separately! Also, please ensure the references used are up-to-date within the last 5 years. The more recent the references you use, the better the quality of your introduction. Please don't provide any repetitive and unimportant information. Furthermore, writes the narrative in a structured, systematic, and concise manner but provides important, accurate, and reasonable information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Example

Title: Relative Risk Estimation and Difference Analysis of Tuberculosis Cases in Aceh Province 2016-2022.

Write the introduction section of a journal manuscript paper according to the provided details. The introduction section consists of the following with a brief description;

Paragraphs 1 and 2: The study's background provides a general context that shows its importance. Write a minimum of two paragraphs. Include a literature survey from recent literature.

Paragraph 3: Mention this study's state of the art, with a review of relevant literature to set the context. Discuss current knowledge and how it relates to the study, and mention similar or previous research efforts and their findings.

Paragraphs 4 and 5: Main research problem and general Solution.

Paragraphs 6 and 7: specific solution of the research problem from the previous research scientific literature.

Paragraph 8: An overview of closely related literature, similar to the solution provided in this study, finally leads to research gaps.

Paragraph 9: Objective, statement of the novelty of justification of the hypothesis, and the scope of the study.

Adhere to academic writing standards in your writing. Enhance scientific text by improving clarity, logical structure, and argument flow. Maintain a formal and neutral tone.

Based on the instructions above, apply the information below to the narrative of the introduction section.

Title: [put narration based on the previous answer from your prompt]

Argument flow (storyboard) : [put narration based on the previous answer from your prompt]

Research Gap: [put narration based on the previous answer from your prompt]

Hypothesis: [put narration based on the previous answer from your prompt]

Novelty: [put narration based on the previous answer from your prompt]

For your information, if you want to add references to your introductory narrative, make sure they are original and display the literature list at the end of your introductory narrative separately! Also, please ensure the references used are up-to-date within the last 5 years. The more recent the references you use, the better the quality of your introduction. Please don't provide any repetitive and unimportant information. Futhermore, writes the narrative in a structured, systematic, and concise manner but provides important, accurate, and reasonable information.

Revise the introduction section by accommodating the information provided, which should be around 550 words.

Ensure the integrity of references in the format of (Author et al., year) and '[Number]' in the revised version of the manuscript, maintaining their format and accuracy. This adjustment ensures that all references remain intact and correctly cited during editing.

Additional information provided:

Literature input (1): [ ... ]

Literature input (2): [ ... ]

Literature input (3): [ ... ]

Literature input (4): [ ... ]

Literature input (5): [ ... ]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Example
Literature input (1): Overview of Tuberculosis cases in the world.
Tuberculosis remains a significant global health concern, with recent estimates indicating a substantial burden of the disease worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that there are approximately 9.2 million new tuberculosis (TB) cases annually, resulting in a global mortality rate of 23% (Kumar et al., 2010). Furthermore, it is noted that TB is responsible for around 1.3 million deaths each year (Lou et al., 2017). The incidence of TB is particularly high in countries like India, South Africa, and Southeast Asia, while lower rates are observed in regions like the United Arab Emirates, Iceland, and the United States (Kim et al., 2022).

Moreover, the emergence of drug-resistant strains, such as multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB), poses additional challenges in TB management. MDR-TB has been documented in nearly 90 countries and regions globally, with a significant number of cases reported (Shah et al., 2007). In 2004, there were 424,000 MDR-TB cases, representing a substantial increase from previous estimates (Haydel, 2010). Additionally, the incidence of TB has been on the rise in recent years, partly due to factors like the increasing prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, which contributes to the higher incidence of TB cases (Batista et al., 2019).

Efforts to combat TB include developing new anti-TB agents and treatment strategies. Research is ongoing to discover novel compounds that target specific proteins in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the causative agent of TB (Kumar et al., 2010). Furthermore, studies have explored the impact of interventions such as social protection and poverty elimination on reducing TB incidence, highlighting the importance of addressing social determinants of health in TB control (Carter et al., 2018).

In conclusion, TB continues to be a major global health challenge, with millions of new cases reported annually and a significant number of deaths attributed to the disease. The emergence of drug-resistant strains and the influence of factors like HIV infection underscore the complexity of TB management. Addressing TB effectively requires a multifaceted approach that includes the development of new treatment options, interventions to address social determinants of health, and ongoing efforts to control the spread of the disease.

Literature input (2): Overview of recent tuberculosis cases in Indonesia.
Recent data indicates that Indonesia continues to face a significant burden of tuberculosis (TB) cases. Indonesia ranks among the top countries globally in terms of TB cases, with the second-highest number of cases reported, amounting to approximately 10% of the world's TB cases (Oktarini, 2024). According to the World Health Organization, the country is also highlighted as one of the top four high-burden countries for TB (‘Azam & Prihastuty, 2023). In 2019, Indonesia recorded 543,874 TB cases, with drug-resistant TB cases reaching 11,463 (Oktaviani et al., 2022).

The prevalence of TB in Indonesia is alarming, with data showing a high number of cases per 100,000 population. For instance, the prevalence of TB in Indonesia was reported at 391 per 100,000 population, with a significant number of deaths recorded in 2016 (Setiyowati, 2022). Additionally, the Case Detection Rate (CDR) of pulmonary TB in Indonesia was 125 cases per 100,000 population in 2015 (Melinda et al., 2022). Furthermore, the prevalence of TB in Indonesia reaches 1.59 new cases per 1000 population, with 27.3% of cases affecting pediatric patients (Yusransyah, 2023).

Efforts to address TB in Indonesia are crucial due to the country's high burden of the disease. Special TB control measures are deemed necessary to combat the relatively high prevalence of TB in Indonesia (Erawati & Andriany, 2022). The incidence of latent TB among healthcare workers, particularly nurses in public health centres, has been on the rise, emphasizing the importance of targeted interventions to prevent the spread of the disease.

In conclusion, Indonesia continues to grapple with a substantial number of TB cases, necessitating focused strategies and interventions to control and reduce the burden of the disease in the country.

Literature input (3): Overview of recent tuberculosis cases in Aceh Province.
Recent data from a study conducted in Lhokseumawe City, which has the highest Case Notification Rate (CNR) of tuberculosis cases in Aceh Province, reported around 351 cases per 100,000 population Novalia et al. (2023). This highlights a significant burden of tuberculosis in this specific area of Aceh Province. Efforts to intervene through education for the community in Uteunkot Village, Muara Dua District, Lhokseumawe City, indicate a proactive approach to addressing tuberculosis in the region. Such targeted interventions are crucial in combating the spread of tuberculosis and improving public health outcomes in Aceh Province.

literature input (4): Overview of the importance of using Standardized Morbidity Rate (SMR)  to calculate the relative risk of tuberculosis

The Standardized Morbidity Rate (SMR) is a crucial tool in epidemiology for calculating the relative risk of tuberculosis. By comparing the observed number of tuberculosis cases in a specific population to the expected number based on a standard population, the SMR provides a standardized morbidity measure that accounts for population demographics differences. This allows researchers and public health officials to assess the relative risk of tuberculosis in different populations, considering factors such as age, sex, and other demographic variables that may influence disease prevalence.

Using the SMR to calculate the relative risk of tuberculosis enables a more accurate assessment of the disease's burden in specific regions or populations. For instance, in Aceh Province, Indonesia, where tuberculosis cases are prevalent, calculating the SMR can provide insights into the relative risk of tuberculosis compared to other regions. This information is essential for guiding public health interventions, resource allocation, and monitoring the effectiveness of tuberculosis control programs.

Studies have utilized the SMR to assess disease prevalence, mortality rates, and the impact of comorbidities on tuberculosis outcomes. By standardizing morbidity rates, researchers can compare disease burden across different populations, identify high-risk groups, and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions. In the context of tuberculosis, where accurate assessment and monitoring are crucial for disease control, the SMR serves as a valuable tool for understanding the relative risk of tuberculosis and informing public health strategies.

Literature input (5): Overview of the importance of knowing the distribution of tuberculosis disease and examining the differences in the distribution of tuberculosis case incidence each year using a statistical method, such as Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) or Kruskall Wallis Test.

Analyzing the distribution of tuberculosis cases and examining the differences in tuberculosis case incidence each year is essential for understanding the epidemiology of the disease and guiding public health interventions. Statistical methods such as Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) or the Kruskall-Wallis Test can provide valuable insights into the variations in tuberculosis incidence across different populations or regions over time.

By applying statistical tests like ANOVA or the Kruskall-Wallis Test to tuberculosis data, researchers can determine if there are significant differences in disease incidence between various groups or years. This analysis identifies trends, patterns, and disparities in tuberculosis burden, which can inform targeted interventions and resource allocation. For example, public health officials can prioritize areas with the highest disease burden for intervention strategies by comparing tuberculosis incidence rates across different age groups or geographical areas within a region like Aceh Province, Indonesia.

Moreover, statistical methods like ANOVA or the Kruskall-Wallis Test enable researchers to assess the effectiveness of tuberculosis control programs by evaluating changes in disease incidence over time. By conducting annual comparisons of tuberculosis case distribution using these statistical tools, public health authorities can track progress, identify areas of improvement, and adjust strategies accordingly. This data-driven approach is crucial for monitoring the impact of interventions and ensuring that resources are allocated effectively to reduce the burden of tuberculosis.

In conclusion, analyzing the distribution of tuberculosis cases and examining differences in tuberculosis case incidence each year using statistical methods like ANOVA or the Kruskall-Wallis Test is vital for understanding disease dynamics, identifying high-risk populations, and evaluating the effectiveness of control measures. These statistical analyses provide a robust framework for evidence-based decision-making in tuberculosis control and prevention efforts.

Note:  For Literature Input, you can also provide information by taking a narrative from the introduction of a recent article published with similar research you want to use.

<<Introduction Draft : Put method draft based on article draft>>

Based on the instructions above, apply the information below to the narrative of the Methods section.

Study design: [ ... ]

Setting: [ ... ]

Participants: [ ... ]

Variables: [ ... ]

Data sources/measurement: [ ... ]

Bias: [ ... ]

study size: [ ... ]

Quantitative variables: [ ... ]

Statistical methods: [ ... ]

Software: [ ... ]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Example

Introduction Draft: In today's fast-paced world, where technology and innovation drive progress, preserving cultural heritage often gets overshadowed. However, profound wisdom is embedded in our ancestors' traditions and practices that continue to offer invaluable insights. This article delves into the rich tapestry of local wisdom, exploring how age-old customs enrich our cultural identity and provide sustainable solutions for contemporary challenges. Join us on a journey through time as we uncover the timeless lessons hidden within the practices of generations past and discover their relevance in our modern world. 

Based on the instructions above, apply the information below to the narrative of the Methods section.

Study design: [ ... ]

Setting: [ ... ]

Participants: [ ... ]

Variables: [ ... ]

Data sources/measurement: [ ... ]

Bias: [ ... ]

study size: [ ... ]

Quantitative variables: [ ... ]

Statistical methods: [ ... ]

Software: [ ... ]

Please write the material and methods section of a journal manuscript paper according to the details I've provided, which should be around 500 words. The methods section consists of the following with a brief description;

#Study design, setting, and population

Paragraphs 1-2: please mention 1) Present key elements of study design early in the paper; 2) Describe the setting, locations, and relevant dates, including recruitment periods, exposure, follow-up, and data collection; 3a). Is there a description of recruitment, including study location(s), inclusion and exclusion criteria for participants, and methods of selection of participant/location, that enables the reader to understand whether the participants are representative and suitable for the research question? 3b). Is information included on the number of participants at each study stage from recruitment to analysis and dropouts/exclusions explained?

#Variables, data source and study size

Paragraphs 3-4: please mention 1) Clearly define all outcomes, exposures, predictors, potential confounders, and effect modifiers. Give diagnostic criteria, if applicable;  2) give data sources and details of assessment methods (measurement) for each variable of interest. Describe comparability of assessment methods if there is more than one group; 3a) The exact sample size (n) for each group/condition (as a number, not a range). Including information about sex ratio, age distribution, and ethnicity, if relevant. 3b) Is there an explanation for how the sample was obtained? 3c) Is there a pre-defined analysis that determined the choice of sample size? or was it a convenience sample?; 4) Describe any efforts to address potential sources of bias

#Statistical Analysis

Paragraphs 5-6: please mention 1) Tell us what software was used in analyzing the study; 2a) Describe all statistical methods and measures used. It should be clear whether the tests are one-sided or two-sided, whether there are adjustments for multiple comparisons, whether medians or means are being shown, whether error bars are standard deviations (SD), standard error of the mean (SEM) or confidence intervals, including those used to control for confounding, 3b) Describe any methods used to examine subgroups and interactions, 3c) Explain how missing data were addressed, 3d) If applicable, describe analytical methods taking account of sampling strategy, 3e) Describe any sensitivity analyses, 3f) Replication (optional): Is there any indication that each experiment, modelling and/or simulation was replicated multiple times, or was any reference made to the extent of variation from account to account? Are statistical methods and measures used? If so, it should be clear whether the tests are one-sided or two-sided, whether there are adjustments for multiple comparisons, whether medians or means are being shown, whether error bars are standard deviations (SD), standard error of the mean (SEM) or confidence intervals, Are Analytics Methods used? If so, is there justification for the appropriateness of statistical tests and modelling used to assess significance? Do the data meet the assumptions of the tests? Is there an estimate of variation within each data group, and is the variance similar between groups being compared?

Based on the instructions above, apply the information below to the narrative of the methods section.

Study design: [ ... ]

Setting: [ ... ]

Participants: [ ... ]

Variables: [ ... ]

Data sources/measurement: [ ... ]

Bias: [ ... ]

study size: [ ... ]

Quantitative variables: [ ... ]

Statistical methods: [ ... ]

Software: [ ... ]

For your information, if you want to add some information to your material and methods narrative, make sure it is correct and original. Furthermore, write the narrative in a structured, systematic, and concise manner but provide important, accurate, and reasonable information.

Assume you are an epidemiology or Health statistics researcher with over 3000 published journal articles in international journals indexed by Scopus, web of Science, and Pubmed. Based on the file I've attached, Please Interpret the table in the attached file by explaining systematically and clearly related to the Table Introduction, Table Structure Description, Data Interpretation, Comparative Analysis, Implications, Limitations, and Conclusions!

<please attach your file>

Thank you for your answer. Your analysis is very accurate. Based on your previous answers. Can you provide a more detailed related data interpretation, Comparative Analysis, and Implications based on the table? Combine the three explanations into several narrative paragraphs that are complete, precise, continuous, structured, and systematic!

Assume you are an epidemiology or Health statistics researcher with over 3000 published journal articles in international journals indexed by Scopus, web of Science, and Pubmed. Based on the attached file, write the discussion section of an article in a journal paper according to the provided details, which should be around 700 words. The discussion section consists of the following with a brief description:

Paragraph 1: Key results (Summarise key results regarding study objectives)

Paragraph 2: Interpretation (Give a cautious overall interpretation of results considering objectives, limitations, multiplicity of analyses, results from similar studies, and other relevant evidence. How do your results agree or disagree with previous studies, and why)

Paragraph 3: Generasability. Discuss the generalisability (or external validity) of the study results.

Paragraph 4: Theory Implication (Theory implications refer to the impact of research findings on existing theories or the development of new theories)

Paragraph 5: Research Implication (Research implications involve the impact of findings on future research directions. They indicate how the current study's results can inform or guide subsequent research efforts) 

Paragraph 6: Practice Implication (Practice implications refer to how research findings can be applied in real-world settings, particularly in professional practice)

Paragraph 7: Policy Implication (Policy implications address how research findings can influence or inform public policies, regulations, or organizational guidelines)

Paragraph 8: Limitation of study (Discuss the study's limitations, considering sources of potential bias or imprecision. Discuss both the direction and magnitude of any potential bias)

Paragraph 9: Conclusions (a. The conclusion section should have very important points describing the important finding of the word b. This section should reinforce the originality of the work presented. c. Should be consistent with the objectives the achievement)

<please attach your file>

Thank you for your reply. Please study the document I attached. The document is a guideline for writing scientific articles in reputable journals with international standards. Study the document comprehensively! Based on your knowledge and the information in the document, write down your suggestions so that the previous draft of the article that I attached to the previous discussion becomes a quality article that meets international standards. 

You must only provide structured and systematic feedback for this assignment's "INTRODUCTION/METHODS/RESULT/DISCUSSION" section. Each piece of feedback you write must answer the questions below.

1. Suggestions you would like to add to the section in the article:

2. Sentences you would like to improve in the draft article (have to or more than 10 sentences):

3. The sentence you want to delete because it repeats information: 

4. Sentences you would like to add to the section for better quality (if any):

The more you suggest improvements, the better the quality of the article. You can look for other information outside of scientific article writing guides to support your work in providing feedback.

<please attach your research guideline>

Study this article very carefully. Assume that you are one of the authors of this study. Based on the attached draft article, the explanation flow has to be structured and systematic. Indicate which sentences should be eliminated or revised, provide alternative sentences for revision, and provide a reasonable explanation for all your suggestions.

<please attach your manuscript draft>

Please study the document I attached. The document is a guideline for writing scientific articles in reputable journals with international standards. Study the document comprehensively! Based on your knowledge and the information in the document.

You must provide structured and systematic feedback for this assignments from the "INTRODUCTION to the "DISCUSSION" section. Show me which sentence should be deleted in this draft article, and also show me in which sentence the repetition of meaning occurs (have to or more than 10 sentences).

<please attach your manuscript draft>

Act as an academic Research Expert, and you are the author of this draft article. Assume you are an epidemiology or Health statistics researcher with over 3000 published journal articles in international journals indexed by Scopus, web of Science, and Pubmed.  Please shorten the narrative in the "Introduction" section below to be more concise, clear, structured, and systematic, about 600 words, without changing the information provided.

As a rule, make sure the points below are still contained in your shortened narrative;

1. The study's background provides a general context that shows its importance. Write a minimum of two paragraphs. Include a literature survey from recent literature.

2. Mention this study's state of the art, with a review of relevant literature to set the context. Discuss current knowledge and how it relates to the study, and mention similar or previous research efforts and their findings.

3. Main research problem and general Solution.

4. Specific solution to the research problem is from the previous scientific literature.

5. An overview of closely related literature, similar to the solution provided in this study, finally leads to research gaps.

6. Objective, statement of the novelty of justification of the hypothesis, and the scope of the study.

Act as an academic Research Expert, and you are the author of this draft article. Assume you are an epidemiology or Health statistics researcher with over 3000 published journal articles in international journals indexed by Scopus, web of Science, and Pubmed. Please shorten the narrative in the "METHODS" section below to be more concise, clear, structured, and systematic, about 500 words, without changing the information provided.

As a rule, make sure the points below are still contained in your shortened narrative;

1. Study design

2. Setting

3. Participants

4. Variables

5. Data sources/measurement

6. study size

7. Quantitative variables

8. Statistical methods

9. Software

Act as an academic Research Expert, and you are the author of this draft article. Assume you are an epidemiology or Health statistics researcher with over 3000 published journal articles in international journals indexed by Scopus, web of Science, and Pubmed. Please shorten the narrative in the "DISCUSSION" section below to be more concise, clear, structured, and systematic, about 700 words, without changing the information provided.

As a rule, make sure the points below are still contained in your shortened narrative;

1. Key results (Summarise key results regarding study objectives)

2. Interpretation (Give a cautious overall interpretation of results considering objectives, limitations, multiplicity of analyses, results from similar studies, and other relevant evidence. How do your results agree or disagree with previous studies, and why)

3. Generasability. Discuss the generalisability (or external validity) of the study results.

4. Theory Implication (Theory implications refer to the impact of research findings on existing theories or the development of new theories)

5. Research Implication (Research implications involve the impact of findings on future research directions. They indicate how the current study's results can inform or guide subsequent research efforts) 

6. Practice Implication (Practice implications refer to how research findings can be applied in real-world settings, particularly in professional practice)

7. Policy Implication (Policy implications address how research findings can influence or inform public policies, regulations, or organizational guidelines)

8. Limitation of study (Discuss the study's limitations, considering sources of potential bias or 9. Discuss both the direction and magnitude of any potential bias)

9. Conclusions (a. The conclusion section should have very important points describing the important finding of the word b. This section should reinforce the originality of the work presented. c. Should be consistent with the objectives-highlight the achievement)

Assume you are an epidemiology or Health statistics researcher with over 3000 published journal articles in international journals indexed by Scopus, web of Science, and Pubmed. Based on the attached draft article, create a concise abstract for a journal article, at most 250 words. The abstract should include the following sections: 1) Background: Outline the study's objectives, study question/hypothesis, or describe the challenge the research addresses. 2) Methods: Describe the study's design, the number of samples, sampling methods, subjects/objects used, location, study period, variables observed/measured, and desired outcomes, including a description of the statistical methods used. 3) Results: Summarize the essential findings and Present specific findings to date. 4) Conclusions: State the main conclusions drawn from the study, describe the results' implications, and summarise critical recommendations. Explain specific findings on how the research addressed the study question, hypothesis, or challenge. Ensure that the abstract is well-structured and presents the essential elements of the research. As a reminder, please study the information in the draft article in great detail to make the resulting abstract accurate and correct.

<please attach your manuscript without abstract>

After you get the abstract of the answer to the previous question command, you can manually correct and grammar-check the abstract in the Grammarly App first.

Based on the abstract below, to keep the word count to at most 250 words, show me which sentences can be removed or replaced and give me a reason why.

 
[Input the new abstrak]

You are the author of the attached research article manuscript. In preparation for submission to an international journal, go through the manuscript in detail and comprehensively. This article is a draft that will be reviewed according to international publication standards. Please consider the following aspects to determine ten appropriate alternative titles for this manuscript:
1. Consider Indicate the study’s design with a commonly used term in the title
2. Normally, the title is not more than 15 words!
3. Keep the title Brief, Short, Simple, and to the Point. phrase describing/reflecting the contents of the article
4. Be Specific
5. Avoid abbreviations, prepositions and formulae where possible
6. Incorporate the keywords so that the article is more likely to appear in the results for relevant online searches.
7. Be understandable to a reader from outside its field.
8. Keep away from using “Investigation of…”; “Study of…”; “More about…”; “…revisited”.
9. Ensure Catchy titles

<please attach your full manuscript without title>

Assume you are an epidemiology or Health statistics researcher with over 3000 published journal articles in international journals indexed by Scopus, Web of Science, and Pubmed. You are the author of the articles. You will submit your draft article to [name of journal] for review and publication. The title and Abstract of your study are as follows:

Title: [ ... ]

Abstract: [ ... ]

Based on this information, create a cover letter for the editor that you will write on the submission form briefly and precisely! Make sure that in the comment to the editor, you also write:
1) That the submission is original;
2) The study aligns with the [name of journal]'s focus;
3) The results of this research are very interesting and provide new insights and implications;
4) The findings are believed to be of interest to the readership of [name of journal];
5)  An explanation of why the submitted work should be published in the journal (the novelty of the work).
6) The writer desires the opportunity to contribute to [name of journal] and looks forward to the manuscript's consideration for publication;
7) That no sentence is copied from other sources without clearly citing its reference;
8) The submitting author takes responsibility for the submission on behalf of all authors as the corresponding author. All authors have reviewed, approved, and consented to the submission and are accountable for its accuracy and integrity in this article.

As information, consider the focus and scope of [name of journal]:
[ ... ]

Highlights

Highlights are three to five (three to four for Cell Press articles) bullet points that help increase your article's discoverability via search engines. These bullet points should capture the novel results of your research and new methods used during the study (if any). Think of them as the "elevator pitch" of your article. Please include terms that you know your readers will be looking for online. Don't try to capture all ideas, concepts or conclusions as highlights are meant to be short: 85 characters or fewer, including spaces.

Highlights offer your paper a considerable advantage online, as they ensure that search engines pick up your article and match it to the right audience. (Nowadays, machines read your work just as often as humans do!). Highlights have been proven to widen the reach of your work and help to ensure that your article is brought to the attention of interested colleagues, both inside and outside your usual research community. Apart from a wider distribution of your research, we hope that this will also lead to new collaborations and help accelerate the pace of science.

Based on the information of Highlights Criteria above and the content of the articles attached, please make 7 highlights!